东南亚6个月旅行:55L单包还是40L+20L双包
Splitting into two backpacks, or a big one?
AI 导读
楼主计划去东南亚约6个月,纠结背包方案:方案一是55L背包加可折叠小背包用于日常,风险是可能不符合登机尺寸;方案二是40L加20L背包,日常够用且可把大包留在住处,但移动时要背两个包。楼主还提到相机已占小折叠包约三分之二空间,长日游不太方便,可能仍需从大包取物,不过所有物品都有收纳袋分装。
正文
大家好!
我要去东南亚大约6个月,正在纠结背包的配置。
方案1)我可以带一个55升的背包,能装下我所有的东西。然后再带一个小巧的可折叠背包用于日常出行。风险是,这个背包可能不符合机舱尺寸要求。(虽然我会尽量少坐飞机)
方案2)我可以带一个40升的背包加一个20升的背包,这样我就有一个 decent 大小的日常包,而且总是可以把大包留在住宿的地方。缺点是,每次移动时都得背着两个背包。
大家觉得哪个更好?你们实际上在一个地方待多久, versus 经常移动?
方案1的另一个缺点是,我带的相机已经占了小折叠背包的大约三分之二。所以对于较长的日间旅行不太方便,可能还是得时不时从大包里清东西出来。不过这也容易,我所有东西都有收纳袋。
查看原文
Hey everyone!
I'm heading to South East Asia for about 6 months and debating on my backpack setup.
Option 1) I could do a 55l backpack, which fits all of my stuff. And then have a small, foldable backpack for daily trips. With the risk, that the backpack won't fit cabine sizes. (Although I'll try to minimize flights anyways)
Option 2) I could do a 40l backpack + a 20l backpack, so I'd have a decent sized daily and could always leave the bigger one at the place I sleep. With the drawback, of having to carry two backpacks whenever I move.
Any opinions on what is nicer? How often did you guys actually stay in a place, vs constantly move?
One further drawback for option 1 is that the camera I'm brining, already fills like 2/3rds of the small, foldable backpack. So not as convenient for longer daytrips, so may still need to clear out the big pack from time to time. Which is easy though, I have packing cubes for everything.
评论
按 Reddit 默认排序的前 6 条,翻译时的快照;不含点赞数评论区观点评论区普遍认为55升背包太大、属于过度打包,推荐40升加小折叠背包或两个20升背包的方案,也有人推荐Osprey Fairview/Fairpoint这种主包加可附加日包的设计。发帖人解释相机占了很大容量,实际携带物品并不多。
查看原文
查看原文
查看原文
查看原文
查看原文
查看原文